Use Of English 2018 Jamb Examination

Use Of English 2018 Jamb Examination
Available Sections
2. Career
4. Job
1234...8

Given Information

A wolf, seeing a lamb drinking from a river, wanted to find a pretext for devouring him, He stood higher up the stream and accused the lamb of muddying the water so that he could not drink. The lamb said that he drank only the tip of his tongue and that in any case he was standing lower down the river, and could not possible disturb the water higher When this excuse failed him, the wolf said: 'Well, last year you insulted my father.' "I wasn't even born then replied the lamb. 'You are good at finding answer' said the wolf, 'but what do you mean by taking up so much of the path where I am walking?' The lamb, frightened at the wolf's angry tone and terrible aspect, told him, with all due submission, that he could not conceive how his walking on such a wide path could occasion him any inconvenience. 'What!' exclaimed the wolf, seemingly in great anger and indignation. 'You are as impudent as your father who seized me by the throat last year and caused me to be kept in a cage for three months'. 'If you will believe me,' said the lamb, 'my parents are poor simple creatures who live entirely by green stuff, we are none of us hunters of your species.' Ah! I see it's no use talking to you,' said the wolf, drawing up close to him. 'it runs in the blood of your family to hate us wolves, and therefore,as we have come so conveniently together, I'll just pay off a few of your forefathers scores before we part.' So saying, he leapt at the lamb from behind and garotted him. Adapted from Bennet. C.H(1978)

Question 1

From the way the story ended, it can be concluded that the.
Show explanation Expand Question
The conclusion of the story is marked by the wolf leaping at the lamb and 'garotting' him. The verb 'garotte' refers to the act of strangling someone to death. This violent action, following the wolf's stated intent to 'pay off' scores and 'devour' the lamb, makes it clear that the encounter ended in the death of the lamb. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the lamb did not survive the interaction.
Not clear enough?

Question 2

The expression 'when this excuse failed him' suggests that the
Show explanation Expand Question
The phrase 'when this excuse failed him' refers to the wolf's initial attempt to find a reason to attack the lamb. The passage states that the wolf 'wanted to find a pretext for devouring him'. When the lamb logically proved it was impossible for him to muddy the water flowing from upstream, the wolf's 'excuse' (or pretext) was invalidated. This indicates that the wolf's accusations were not based on actual grievances but were fabricated charges designed to justify an act of aggression that he had already decided upon.
Not clear enough?

Question 3

The charges levelled against the lamb are
Show explanation Expand Question
Throughout the dialogue, the wolf levels several specific accusations. First, he accuses the lamb of 'muddying the water' (pollution). Second, he claims the lamb 'insulted' his father (insolence/disrespect). Third, he asks why the lamb is 'taking up so much of the path' (obstruction). Finally, he accuses the lamb's father of having 'seized me by the throat' (aggression). These four categories—pollution, insolence, obstruction, and aggression—comprehensively cover the false pretexts used by the wolf to justify his attack.
Not clear enough?

Question 4

The expression angry tone and terrible aspect refers to the wolf’s
Show explanation Expand Question
In literary descriptions, 'tone' relates to the quality of a person's voice, while 'aspect' refers to their physical appearance or presence. An 'angry tone' suggests a voice that is sharp, loud, or harsh. A 'terrible aspect' suggests an appearance that inspires fear or terror—essentially a menacing or threatening posture. Therefore, the phrase describes the combination of the wolf's frightening vocal delivery and his intimidating physical presence, which left the lamb feeling frightened and submissive.
Not clear enough?

Question 5

Which of the following aptly describes the moral of the story?
Show explanation Expand Question
The proverb 'If you want to hang a dog, any rope will do' (or 'any stick will do to beat a dog') perfectly encapsulates the theme of this fable. It means that if someone is determined to attack, punish, or destroy another person, they will easily find or invent any excuse, however flimsy or illogical, to justify their actions. The wolf had already decided to devour the lamb; the series of increasingly ridiculous accusations were merely the 'ropes' he used to satisfy his own pretense of justification.
Not clear enough?

Given Information

In order to approach the problem of anxiety in play, let us consider the problem of anxiety in play, let us consider the activity of building and destroying a tower. Many a mother thinks that her little son is in a 'destructive stage' or even has a 'destructive personality' because after building a big, big tower, the boy cannot follow her advice to leave the tower for Daddy to see, but instead must kick it and make it collapse. The almost manic pleasure with which children watch the collapse in a second of the product of long play-labour has puzzled many, especially since the child does not appreciate it at all if his tower falls by accident or by a helpful uncle’s hand. He, the builder, must destroy it himself. This game, I should think, arises from the not so distant experience of sudden falls at the very time when standing upright on wobbly legs afforded a new and fascinating perspective on existence. The child who consequently learns to make a tower 'stand up' enjoys causing the same tower to waver and collapse; in addition to the active mastery over a previously passive event, it makes one feel stronger to know that there is somebody weaker ----and towers, unlike little sister, can't cry and call, 'Mummy!'

Question 6

According to this passage, it gives the child great pleasure
Show explanation Expand Question
The passage explicitly states that the child 'does not appreciate it at all if his tower falls by accident or by a helpful uncle’s hand.' It emphasizes that the child must be the one to initiate the destruction, as seen in the phrase 'He, the builder, must destroy it himself.' This act of personal destruction provides the child with a sense of mastery and 'manic pleasure,' contrasting with the disappointment felt when the tower is preserved for others or destroyed by external forces.
Not clear enough?

Question 7

What other feeling does the child derive from the fall of his tower apart from pleasure?
Show explanation Expand Question
Towards the end of the text, the author notes that destroying the tower provides more than just enjoyment; 'it makes one feel stronger to know that there is somebody weaker.' This indicates a shift from being a passive victim of gravity (falling on 'wobbly legs') to being an active force of power. The act of making the tower 'waver and collapse' reinforces a sense of personal strength and superiority over the inanimate object.
Not clear enough?

Question 8

How does the author try to explain this ‘destructive stage'?
Show explanation Expand Question
The author provides a psychological explanation for the behavior by linking it to the child's own motor development. The passage suggests this game 'arises from the not so distant experience of sudden falls at the very time when standing upright on wobbly legs afforded a new and fascinating perspective on existence.' By knocking down the tower, the child is essentially gaining 'active mastery' over the phenomenon of falling, which was previously a 'passive event' that happened to them.
Not clear enough?

Question 9

The expression 'must kick it and make it collapse' in this context means
Show explanation Expand Question
In the context of the passage, the word 'must' describes an internal psychological drive rather than an external command or legal obligation. The child feels a strong, instinctive need to destroy his creation to achieve a sense of mastery and pleasure. This makes 'cannot resist the urge to demolish it' the most accurate interpretation, as it captures the impulsive and necessary nature of the act from the child's perspective.
Not clear enough?

Question 10

In the passage 'manic pleasure' means
Show explanation Expand Question
The term 'manic' refers to a state of extreme excitement, energy, or elation. When paired with 'pleasure' in this context, it describes an intense, overwhelming, and perhaps slightly uncontrolled form of joy that the child experiences during the collapse of the tower. This suggests a level of enjoyment that is 'unlimited' or boundless in its intensity, far exceeding a calm or simple sense of satisfaction.
Not clear enough?

1234...8
In this page
Use-of-english 2018 Jamb Examination
Open Model!